You are upset about a concept you know nothing about -___-. She was a puppet character, a ghost, a nobody without FINER DETAILS and finer details is all that matters. There's no ifs and or buts about that fact. Eight sentences collectively taken from different interviews by Nomura - " Yes she is the main female character. If people have seen my work before, they will know that there is few description on the female characters. She is the first female character that will stand out from all previous Final Fantasy's.She is a very polite girl. She will not say those things to someone who she's met for the first time. To express this characteristic, the way she speaks will have some prominent trait. She's polite, so she doesn't say the case in their first meeting. Besides that, I wanted to emphasize her well upbringing, there's something characteristic about the way she speaks."- and a fan dub over a voiceless scene led to emotions for Stella. Let them go. WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN is irrelevant to FF15. You do not know WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN. You can speculate and hype up the potential for something interesting based on that speculation. But hanging onto the past it is not healthy, especially if Tabata keeps on moving towards the future.
I can only say this so many times. FFVS13 was revamped, stop looking at it. Why would you put exceptions in place thinking FF15 would be a copy and paste of every bit of narrative previously left over in the same exact manner? Nomura wanted an entire saga. Square Enix's president wants a single story.
Adaption theory posits that when a work piece (i.e. - novel) gains new life in another medium (i.e. - video game), something from the former shall change, and such change is inevitable whether the audience appreciates it or not. On the other hand, those who became religiously attached to the original work piece may condemn a revamp of it as a travesty, putting blame on anyone in charge; they want nothing more than anonymous director to reflect a word-for-word transcription, with utmost care that each character and their arc, setting and its lore, and conflict be reproduced in detail matching the original work piece. If not accomplished then they take the Chicken Little approach. THE SKY IS FALLING.
Confusion mixed with frustration is an expression of their fears that the staff doesn't care much about the original work piece. The consequences leave naysayers averse to losing all aspects of what came first, compared to the enjoyment gained from improvements.
Yes naysayers have a point with their rants if changes, drastic or small, hurt the final product in the context its given. Outside that context, the changes may make the original work piece unrecognizable.
Why am I bringing up adaption theory despite Tabta not adapting? Because the theory is still applicable to ongoing works where one person leaves for another to fill in their shoes - "This is not the exact same game. The director is different, and the platform was switched to the current gen. And because the platform has changed, there were things we had to re-evaluate, like what we can and cannot do or even what we have to do. The various circumstances are different." Tabata already said last year FF15 is different, but obviously evidence also shows he still keeps the core elements that made FF1VS13 the game Nomura dreamed of: fantasy based on reality, road trip, dark and edgy tropes, light hearted moments, tragedy, family/friend dynamics, locations still the same based on their previous revel, etc. Stella's role was always N/A apart from being a force in opposition to Noctis. How important is that role to the revamp of FFVS13's story? Apparently it doesn't fit well like a puzzle piece and Tababta had a hard time making sense of her as an individual in the new context. We have to look at the new context. Not the old context. Without details on the old context we can not judge everything we know about the new context via compare and contrast. It's just grasping straws.... Consistency is irrelevant to your concerns for Stella because Luna replaces Stella. Whatever Stella was changed to fit Luna, who Tabta claims fits the story he is now using. Stella fits the old story. She was who she was and we will never learn any details right now. Luna is who she is and we will learn details later on. The canon has been tweaked to fall in with Luna. That is nothing to get angry over until the final game releases; if there's a massive gaps between Luna and everyone else then yes Tabata messed up. You are afraid of continuity errors by holding FFVS13 as the standard for FF15. That's fine. Would everything else be messed up because Stella disappeared? I accept Stella's connection is irrelevant to the new canon, so I'm not so cynical. That is more so because the new canon hasn't gotten rid of everything important. I say get over it and stay tuned for more information like I do; it leads to less frustration. Go with things and judge them in their context rather than clinging onto what you wanted to see. Right now there's not enough details to judge Luna based on the old context (Stella). I can paraphrase scenes and their tropes, but thats about it. And thats what I was doing here.
I think we should be most worried about translations. and better voice acting! BATMAN NOCTIS